Implementasi Big Data Analytics dan Opini Audit terhadap Kualitas Audit dengan Audit Delay Sebagai Variabel Mediasi

Authors

  • Anisa Listya
    ✉ Corresponding author: listya_anisa@fe.unsri.ac.id
    Universitas Sriwijaya
  • Aspahani Aspahani Universitas Sriwijaya
  • Christian Damar Sagara Sitepu Universitas Sriwijaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v7i3.1531

Keywords:

Big Data Analytics, audit opinion, audit delay, audit quality

Abstract

This research is based on the relationship between Big Data Analytics and its impact on the quality of audit evidence and the level of assurance felt by end users of financial statements. Big Data Analytics potentially play an important role in innovative auditing practices. Big Data Analytics can increase the efficiency and effectiveness of financial statement audits, but additional competencies and technological capabilities are required to implement Big Data Analytics. With Big Data, auditors can minimize the risks posed by sampling, and therefore, provide a reasonable level of assurance. This study aims to examine Big Data Analytics variables and audit opinion whether these two variables are antecedent variables of audit delay and affect audit quality. This study uses secondary data in the form of the company's annual financial report. The population in this study are all companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). The population in this study were 100 companies in the telecommunications, transportation and banking sub-sectors that met the criteria and had been determined to be related to problems during the 2016 to 2020. The data analysis technique in this study was to use the Structural Equation Model to examine the mediating effect. The implementation of big data analytics has no effect on the audit delay variable. Based on the research results, there is sufficient evidence that audit opinion has a significant positive effect on audit delay. However, there is not enough evidence that BDA has a significant positive effect on audit delay

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbott, L.J., S. Parker, and G.F. Peters. 2004. Audit committee characteristics and restatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 23 (1): 69-87.

Alles, M.G. 2015. Drivers of the use and facilitators and obstacles of the evolution of big data by the audit profession. Accounting Horizons 29 (2): 439-449.

Alotaibi, M. Z., Alotibi, M. F., & Zraqat, O. M. (2021). The impact of information technology governance in reducing cloud accounting information systems risks in telecommunications companies in the state of Kuwait. Modern Applied Science, 15(1), 143–151. https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v15n1p143

Appelbaum, D. (2016). Securing big data provenance for auditors: The big data provenance black box as reliable evidence. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 13(1), 17–36. https:// doi.org/10.2308/jeta-51473.

Aobdia, D. 2019. Do practitioner assessments agree with academic proxies for audit quality? Evidence from PCAOB and internal inspections. Journal of Accounting and Economics 67 (1): 144-174.

Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., D.W. Collins, and W.R. Kinney Jr. 2007. The discovery and reporting of internal control deficiencies prior to SOX-mandated audits. Journal of Accounting and Economics 44 (1-2): 166-192.

Bauer, T., & Estep, C. (2019). One team or two? Investigating relationship quality between auditors and IT specialists: Implications for audit team identity and the audit process.

Contemporary Accounting Research, 36(4), 2142–2177. https://doi.org/10.1111/19113846.12490

Beasley, M.S. 1996. An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. The Accounting Review 71 (4): 443-465.

Beatty, A. and J. Weber. 2006. Accounting discretion in fair value estimates: An examination of SFAS 142 goodwill impairments. Journal of Accounting Research 44 (2): 257-288.

Beck, M.J., J.R. Francis, and J.L. Gunn. 2018. Public company audits and city?specific labor characteristics. Contemporary Accounting Research 35 (1): 394-433.

Beck, M.J., J.L. Gunn, and N. Hallman. 2019. The geographic decentralization of audit firms and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics 68 (1): 1-25.

Bratten, B., L.M. Gaynor, L. McDaniel, N.R. Montague, and G.E. Sierra. 2013. The audit of fair values and other estimates: The effects of underlying environmental, task, and auditor-specific factors. Auditing: A Journal of Practice 32 (Supplement 1): 7-44.

Cahan, S.F., D. Emanuel, and J. Sun. 2009. Are the reputations of the large accounting firms really international? Evidence from the Andersen?Enron affair. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 28 (2): 199-226.

Cahan, S.F., J.M.Godfrey, J. Hamilton, and D.C. Jeter. 2008. Auditor specialization, auditor dominance, and audit fees: The role of investment opportunities. The Accounting Review 83 (6): 1393-1423.

Cao, Y., L.A. Myers, and T.C. Omer. 201 Does company reputation matter for financial reporting quality? Evidence from restatements. Contemporary Accounting Research 29 (3): 956-990.

Carcello, J.V., T.L. Neal, Z.V. Palmrose, and S. Scholz. 2011. CEO involvement in selecting board members, audit committee effectiveness, and restatements. Contemporary Accounting Research 28 (2): 396-430.

Chin, C.L. and H.Y. Chi. 2009. Reducing restatements with increased industry expertise. Contemporary Accounting Research 26 (3): 729-765.

Cheffers, M., D. Whalen, and O. Usvyatsky. 2011. 2010 Financial restatements: A ten year comparison. Audit Analytics (May).

Available at: http://www.auditanalytics.com/0002/view-custom- reports.php?report¼51de31fb816fec536e562498a0c9e532

Cohen, J.R., U. Hoitash, G. Krishnamoorthy, and A.M. Wright. 2014. The effect of audit committee industry expertise on monitoring the financial reporting process. The Accounting Review 89 (1): 243-273.

Columbus, L. 2017. 53% of companies are adopting big data analytics. Forbes Available at https://www.forbes.com/sites/louiscolumbus/2017/12/24/53-of-companies-are- adopting-big-data-analytics/#24ec48ea39a1.

Columbus, L. 2018. Big data analytics adoption soared in the enterprise in 2018. Forbes Available at https://www.forbes.com/sites/louiscolumbus/2018/12/23/big-dataanalytics- adoption-soared-in-the-enterprise-in-2018/#67cae638332f.

Dao, M., K. Raghunandan, and D.V. Rama. 2012. Shareholder voting on auditor selection, audit fees, and audit quality. The Accounting Review 87 (1): 149-171.

Dechow, P.M., W. Ge, C.R. Larson, and R.G. Sloan. 2011. Predicting material accounting misstatements. Contemporary Accounting Research 28 (1): 17-82.

DeFond, M. and J. Zhang. 2014. A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics 58 (2-3): 275-326.

Dye, R.A. 1993. Auditing standards, legal liability, and auditor wealth. Journal of Political Economy 101 (5): 887-914.

Dagiliene, L. and Kloviene, L. (2019) Motivation to use big data and big data analytics in external auditing. Managerial Auditing Journal, 34 (7). pp. 750-782. ISSN 0268-6902 https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-01-2018-1773

De Pietro, R., Wiarda, E., and Fleischer, M. (1990). The context for change: Organization, technology and environment. In L. G. Tornatzky, M. Fleischer, & A. K. Chakrabarti (Eds.), The processes of technologi-cal innovation (pp. 151-175). Lexington Books.

El-Monem, A.A., & Serag (2020). A Proposed Framework for Big Data Analytics in External Auditing and Its Impact on Audit Quality with A Field Study in Egypt.

Ettredge, M., M. Sherwood, and L. Sun. 2020. Office-Client Balance and Metro Area Audit Market Competition. Available at SSRN 2374377.

Francis, J.R., P.N. Michas, and M.D. Yu. 2013. Office size of Big 4 auditors and client restatements. Contemporary Accounting Research 30 (4): 1626-1661.

Francis, J.R. and M.D. Yu. 2009. Big 4 office size and audit quality. The Accounting Review 84(5): 1521-1552.

Frank, K.A. 2000. Impact of a confounding variable on a regression coefficient.

Sociological Methods & Research 29 (2): 147-194.

Greene, W. 2004. The behaviour of the maximum likelihood estimator of limited dependent variable models in the presence of fixed effects. The Econometrics Journal 7 (1): 98-119.

Griffith, E.E., J.S. Hammersley, and K. Kadous. 2015. Audits of complex estimates as verification

of management numbers: How institutional pressures shape practice. Contemporary Accounting Research 32 (3): 833-863.

Hoopes, J.L., K.J. Merkley, J. Pacelli, and J.H. Schroeder. 2018. Audit personnel salaries and audit quality. Review of Accounting Studies 23 (3): 1096-1136.

Hussien, L., Okour, S., AlRawashdeh, H., Ali, O., Zraqat, O., & Zureigat, Q. (2021). Explanatory factors for asymmetric cost behavior: Evidence from Jordan. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity, and Change, 15(4), 201–219.

ICAEW. 2020. Data Analytics for external auditors. Available at https://www.icaew.com/-

/media/corporate/files/technical/iaa/tecpln14726-iaae-data-analytics---webversion.ashx

Ji, S. H., & Yoon, K. C. (2020). The effects of widening daily stock price limit the relevance between audit quality and stock return. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(4), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020. vol7.no4.107 Kedia, S. and S. Rajgopal. 2011. Do the SEC's enforcement preferences affect corporate misconduct? Journal of Accounting and Economics 51 (3): 259-278.

Kinney Jr, W.R. Z.V. Palmrose, and S. Scholz. 2004. Auditor independence, non?audit services, and restatements: Was the US government right? Journal of Accounting Research 42 (3): 561-588.

Kim, I. and D.J. Skinner. 2012. Measuring securities litigation risk. Journal of Accounting and Economics 53 (1-2): 290-310.

Knechel, W.R., V. Naiker, and G. Pacheco. 2007. Does auditor industry specialization matter? Evidence from market reaction to auditor switches. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 26 (1): 19-45.

Larcker, D.F., and T.O. Rusticus. 2010. On the use of instrumental variables in accounting research. Journal of Accounting and Economics 49 (3): 186-205.

Lennox, C. and B. Li. 2014. Accounting misstatements following lawsuits against auditors. Journal of Accounting and Economics 57 (1): 58-75.

Naiker, V., D.S. Sharma, and V.D. Sharma. 2013. Do former audit firm partners on audit committees procure greater nonaudit services from the auditor? The Accounting Review 88 (1): 297-326.

Numan, W., and M. Willekens. 2012. An empirical test of spatial competition in the audit market. Journal of Accounting and Economics 53 (1-2): 450-465.

Salijeni, G., Samsonova-Taddei, A., & Turley, S. (2019). Big Data and changes in audit technology: contemplating a research agenda. Accounting and Business Research, 49(1), 95–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2018.1459458

Salijeni, G., Samsonova-Taddei, A., & Turley, S. (2021). Understanding how big data technologies reconfigure the nature and organization of financial statement audits: A socio-material analysis. European Accounting Review, 30(3), 531–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2021.1882320

Skinner, D.J. and R.G. Sloan. 2002. Earnings surprises, growth expectations, and stock returns or don't let an earnings torpedo sink your portfolio. Review of Accounting Studies 7 (2-3): 289-312.

Skinner, D.J. and S. Srinivasan 2012. Audit quality and auditor reputation: Evidence from Japan. The Accounting Review 87 (5): 1737-1765.

Suyanto, S., Putry, N. A. C., & Sugiharti, E. (2018). Anteseden Dan Konsekuensi Audit Delay Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Akuntansi Dewantara, 2(1), 96–108. https://doi.org/10.26460/ad.v2i1.2581.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-01

How to Cite

Listya, A., Aspahani, A., & Sitepu, C. D. S. . (2023). Implementasi Big Data Analytics dan Opini Audit terhadap Kualitas Audit dengan Audit Delay Sebagai Variabel Mediasi. Owner : Riset Dan Jurnal Akuntansi, 7(3), 2062-2071. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v7i3.1531