The Role of Board Composition on ESG Disclosure: An Analytical Study in Indonesia

Authors

  • Iskandar Itan Universitas Internasional Batam
  • Rendy Diaz Hilrian Universitas Internasional Batam
  • Mariska Ramadana Universitas Internasional Batam

DOI:

10.33395/owner.v9i4.2817

Keywords:

Audit Committee, Board Composition, ESG Disclosure, Female Board Committee, Market Capitalization

Abstract

Market capitalization and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) disclosure have become increasingly interconnected in contemporary corporate governance, yet the mechanisms through which board composition influences ESG transparency in emerging markets remain insufficiently explored. This study examines the relationship between board characteristics and ESG disclosure quality among Indonesian listed companies, specifically analyzing how these relationships manifest across different market capitalization thresholds. Using panel data regression analysis of 256 observations from 64 Indonesian Stock Exchange companies over 2019-2022, this research investigates the effects of board size, board meetings, female board representation, audit committee size, nomination and remuneration committee size, and board compensation on ESG disclosure practices. The study addresses a critical research gap by providing empirical evidence from Indonesia's underrepresented emerging market context, where corporate governance structures and disclosure practices differ markedly from Western frameworks. Results reveal that market capitalization demonstrates no significant impact on ESG disclosure quality, contradicting conventional expectations. Board size and female director representation exhibit unexpected negative relationships with ESG disclosure, suggesting coordination challenges and potential tokenistic appointments within Indonesian contexts. Conversely, audit committee size, nomination and remuneration committee size, and board compensation demonstrate robust positive associations with ESG transparency, highlighting their critical roles in enhancing oversight capacity and aligning managerial incentives. This research contributes theoretically by challenging universal governance prescriptions and demonstrating contextual variations in board mechanism effectiveness within emerging economies. Practically, findings suggest Indonesian corporations should prioritize committee-based governance structures and performance-linked compensation over numerical board expansion. Policymakers should emphasize substantive governance effectiveness through director training and accountability mechanisms rather than mandating demographic diversity targets alone. Future research should pursue longitudinal analysis and qualitative investigations to illuminate temporal dynamics and cultural mechanisms underlying governance-ESG relationships in Southeast Asian markets.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

        Plum-X Analityc

References

Abdelmoneim, Z., & El-Deeb, M. S. (2024). BOD characteristics and their impact on the link between ESG disclosure and integrated reporting disclosure quality: a study of Egyptian non-financial firms. Future Business Journal, 10(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-023-00297-y

Agyemang, A. O., Yusheng, K., Twum, A. K., Ayamba, E. C., Kongkuah, M., & Musah, M. (2021). Trend and relationship between environmental accounting disclosure and environmental performance for mining companies listed in China. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(8), 12192–12216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01164-4

Albuquerque, R., Koskinen, Y., & Zhang, C. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: Theory and empirical evidence. Management Science, 65(10), 4451–4469. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3043

Alkurdi, A., Al Amosh, H., & Khatib, S. F. A. (2023). The mediating role of carbon emissions in the relationship between the board attributes and ESG performance: European evidence. EuroMed Journal of Business, 19(4), 1016–1041. https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-08-2022-0144

Anifowose, M. (2025). Evidence of the impact of corporate governance on ESG disclosure in sub-Saharan Africa: the moderating role of ownership structure. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, (0123456789). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-025-00294-3

Arif, M., Sajjad, A., Farooq, S., Abrar, M., & Joyo, A. S. (2020). The impact of audit committee attributes on the quality and quantity of environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosures. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 21(3), 497–514. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-06-2020-0243

Asmoro, P. S., Ramakrishnan, S., Arsyanda, S., Alfandia, N. S., Ningsih, D. N. C., Rokhimakhumullah, D. N. F., & Hidayat, K. (2024). ESG disclosure, governance, political connection, and tax Aggressiveness: what information is critical, and is more information always forceful? Cogent Business and Management, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2435600

Assael, J., Carlier, L., & Challet, D. (2023). Dissecting the Explanatory Power of ESG Features on Equity Returns by Sector, Capitalization, and Year with Interpretable Machine Learning. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16030159

Aziz, S. A. (2024). Pengaruh Kinerja Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan Dengan Kekuatan Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Sebagai Variabel Moderasi Di Malaysia. (February), 4–6.

Basile, V., Serino, L., Ambra, A. D., & Campanella, F. (2025). Board characteristics and effects on ESG performance: empirical evidence from the European banking system. Quality and Quantity. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-025-02338-w

Birindelli, G., Iannuzzi, A. P., & Savioli, M. (2019). The impact of women leaders on environmental performance: Evidence on gender diversity in banks. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(6), 1485–1499. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1762

Buallay, A. (2019). Is sustainability reporting (ESG) associated with performance? Evidence from the European banking sector. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 30(1), 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-12-2017-0149

Chandrasena, S., Matthews, L., & Gerged, A. M. (2024). Does the presence of a sustainability committee strengthen the impact of ESG disclosure on tax aggressiveness? Insights from North America. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 1039–1065. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-024-01368-z

Chaudhry, N. I., Roomi, M. A., & Aftab, I. (2020). Impact of expertise of audit committee chair and nomination committee chair on financial performance of firm. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 20(4), 621–638. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-01-2020-0017

Christensen, D., Serafeim, G., Sikochi, A., Bradshaw, M., Carter, M. E., Doyle, J., … Weber, J. (2020). Why is Corporate Virtue in the Eye of The Beholder? The Case of ESG Ratings We thank Vishal Baloria. Social Science Research Network, (617).

Darsono, D., Ratmono, D., Tujori, A., & Clarisa, T. Y. (2025). The relationship between ESG, financial performance, and cost of debt: the role of independent assurance. Cogent Business and Management, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2437137

Denys Vochenko, Q. X. S. K. (2023). Impact of ESG factors on the market capitalization of companies. Research in International Business and Finance. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=4719937

Desy Hapsari, H., & Arieftiara, D. (2024). The Effect of Audit Committee Size, Board Size, and Women on the Board on the Disclosure of Environment, Social, and Good Governance (ESG) Reports Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesian Mining Companies. KnE Social Sciences, 2024, 36–46. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i20.16469

Dowling, John, & Pfeffer, Jeffrey. (1975). Organizational Legitimacy: Social Values and Organizational Behavior. Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/1388226

Fang, X., & Ju, C. (2024). Digital transformation and corporate financialization in emerging markets: Evidence from China. Heliyon, 10(2), e24616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24616

Freeman, R. E. E., & McVea, J. (2005). A Stakeholder Approach to Strategic Management. SSRN Electronic Journal, (March). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.263511

Galema, R., & Gerritsen, D. (2025). ESG rating changes and stock returns. Journal of International Money and Finance, 154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2025.103309

García Martín, C. J., & Herrero, B. (2020). Do board characteristics affect environmental performance? A study of EU firms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 74–94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1775

Ghazali, A., & Zulmaita, Z. (2022). Pengaruh pengungkapan environmental, social, and governance (esg) terhadap tingkat profitabilitas perusahaan (studi pada perusahaan sektor infrastruktur yang terdaftar di bursa efek indonesia). Seminar Nasional Akuntansi Dan Manajemen PNJ, 3.

Güngör, N., & ?eker, Y. (2022). The relationship between board characteristics and ESG performance: Evidence from the oil, gas and coal sector. Stratejik ve Sosyal Ara?t?rmalar Dergisi, 6(1), 17–37.

Gurol, B., & Lagasio, V. (2022). Women board members’ impact on ESG disclosure with environment and social dimensions: evidence from the European banking sector. Social Responsibility Journal, 19(1), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-08-2020-0308

Handoyo, S., & Anas, S. (2024). The effect of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) on firm performance: the moderating role of country regulatory quality and government effectiveness in ASEAN. Cogent Business and Management, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2371071

Hill, J. (2020). Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Investing: A Balanced Analysis of the Theory and Practice of a Sustainable Portfolio. Academic Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books?id=y8i2DwAAQBAJ

Iannuzzi, A. P., Dell’Atti, S., D’Apolito, E., & Galletta, S. (2023). Nomination committee characteristics and exposure to environmental, social and governance (ESG) controversies: evidence from European global systemically important banks. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 23(6), 1314–1338. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-03-2022-0119

Jafar, R., Basuki, B., Windijarto, W., Setiawan, R., & Yaacob, Z. (2024). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure and cost of equity: the moderating effects of board structures. Cogent Business and Management, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2429794

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Jitmaneeroj, B. (2023). Prioritizing CSR components for value enhancement: Evidence from the financial industry in developed and emerging markets. Heliyon, 9(5), e16044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16044

Lhutfi, I., Ludigdo, U., Rusydi, M. K., & Baridwan, Z. (2024). Investment and sustainability: CSR, SDGs and the ESG Score in Indonesia. Cogent Business and Management, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2328311

Liu, T., Abdelbaky, A., Elamer, A. A., & Elmahgoub, M. (2023). Real earnings management and ESG disclosure in emerging markets: The moderating effect of managerial ownership from a social norm perspective. Heliyon, 9(12), e22832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22832

Lu, L. (2023). ESG-based remuneration in the wave of sustainability. Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 23(1), 297–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735970.2023.2253888

Mahran, K., & Elamer, A. A. (2025). Navigating the Corporate Ego: Understanding the Association Between ESG Performance and Organizational Narcissistic Rhetoric. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-025-06090-x

Menicucci, E., & Paolucci, G. (2024). Women on Board and ESG Performance: Insights from the Italian Utilities Sector. International Journal of Business and Management, 19(3), 73. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v19n3p73

Modjo, M. I., Hutagaol-Martowidjojo, Y., & Victoria, M. (2025). Shaping performance in downturns: the role of ESG and Shariah compliance in Indonesia. Cogent Business and Management, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2025.2537798

Muhammad Fauzan Fachrezi, Sarah Fauziah, Muhammad Iqbal, & Amrie Firmansyah. (2024). Esg Risk Dan Nilai Perusahaan Di Indonesia. Akuntansiku, 3(2), 64–76.

Orazalin, N., & Mahmood, M. (2021). Toward sustainable development: Board characteristics, country governance quality, and environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 3569–3588. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2820

Pozzoli, M., Pagani, A., & Paolone, F. (2022). The impact of audit committee characteristics on ESG performance in the European Union member states: Empirical evidence before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Cleaner Production, 371(November 2021), 133411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133411

Prayoga, D., Oktavia, R., Joko Prasetyo, T., & Kusumawardhani, N. (2024). Can Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Disclosures Influence the Value of Market Capitalization Indexed by ESG Leaders in Indonesia in 2018-2022? International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies, 4(1), 997–1003. https://doi.org/10.62225/2583049x.2024.4.1.2326

Rizqi Amalia, & Kusuma, I. W. (2023). The Influence of Environmental, Social and Governance Performance on Market Performance with ESG Controversy as a Variable. 11(2).

Rosa, A., Putri, C., & Pangaribuan, C. (2024). ESG Impact on LQ45 Stock Returns: Early Appraisal. Business and Entrepreneurial Review, 24(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.25105/v24i1.18707

Samy El-Deeb, M., Ismail, T. H., & El Banna, A. A. (2023). Does audit quality moderate the impact of environmental, social and governance disclosure on firm value? Further evidence from Egypt. Journal of Humanities and Applied Social Sciences, 5(4), 293–322. https://doi.org/10.1108/jhass-11-2022-0155

Samy ElDeeb, M., Salah ElGabry, N., Mounir, N., & Ahmed, M. (2025). Nexus among herding behavior, ESG disclosure, and market capitalization in the Egyptian stock market. Future Business Journal, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-025-00573-z

Saring, S., Ariwibowo, P., & Djuhartono, T. (2022). Resistance of Transformational Leadership and Work-Life Balance on Lecturers Performance in DKI Jakarta. Judicious, 3(2), 279–287. https://doi.org/10.37010/jdc.v3i2.1099

Sekar, A., Indah, P., & Cahyonowati, N. (2023). Pengaruh Mekanisme Corporate Governance Terhadap Sustainability Reporting. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 12(3), 1–11. Retrieved from http://ejournal-s1.undip.ac.id/index.php/accounting

?erban, R. A., Mihaiu, D. M., & ?ichindelean, M. (2022). Environment, Social, and Governance Score and Value Added Impacts on Market Capitalization: A Sectoral?Based Approach. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042069

Shahbaz, M., Raghutla, C., Chittedi, K. R., Jiao, Z., & Vo, X. V. (2020). The effect of renewable energy consumption on economic growth: Evidence from the renewable energy country attractive index. Energy, 207(101168). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118162

Shanaev, S., & Ghimire, B. (2022). When ESG meets AAA: The effect of ESG rating changes on stock returns. Finance Research Letters, 46(102302). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102302

Suhartini, D., Tjahjadi, B., & Fayanni, Y. (2024). Impact of sustainability reporting and governance on firm value: insights from the Indonesian manufacturing sector. Cogent Business and Management, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2381087

Suttipun, M. (2021). The influence of board composition on environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure of Thai listed companies. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 18(4), 391–402. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-021-00120-6

Syafik, M., Setiawan, D., Hartoko, S., & Aryani, Y. A. (2025). The role of media exposure on board capital and carbon emission disclosure. Discover Sustainability, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01014-1

Uyar, A., Kilic, M., Koseoglu, M. A., Kuzey, C., & Karaman, A. S. (2020). The link among board characteristics, corporate social responsibility performance, and financial performance: Evidence from the hospitality and tourism industry. Tourism Management Perspectives, 35, 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100714

von Wallis, M., & Klein, C. (2015). Ethical requirement and financial interest: a literature review on socially responsible investing. Business Research, 8(1), 61–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-014-0015-7

Wong, S. L. (2023). The impact of female representation and ethnic diversity in committees on environmental, social and governance performance in Malaysia. Society and Business Review, 19(2), 207–229. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-02-2023-0052

Yassen, S. O., Attia, E. F., & Abdou, H. A. (2025). The effect of endogeneity on the relationship between disclosure level and cost of equity capital: The Egyptian case. Heliyon, 11(12), e43460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e43460

Zahid, M., Rahman, H. U., Muneer, S., Butt, B. Z., Isah-Chikaji, A., & Memon, M. A. (2019). Nexus between government initiatives, integrated strategies, internal factors and corporate sustainability practices in Malaysia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 241, 118329. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118329

Downloads

Published

2025-10-15

How to Cite

Itan, I. ., Hilrian, R. D., & Ramadana, M. (2025). The Role of Board Composition on ESG Disclosure: An Analytical Study in Indonesia. Owner : Riset Dan Jurnal Akuntansi, 9(4), 3312-3334. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v9i4.2817