Implementing Artificial Intelligence in Auditing: A Systematic Literature Review of Trends, Challenges, and Adoption

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v10i2.3389

Abstract

This study aims to systematically review and synthesize the application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the field of auditing, with a focus on development trends, benefits, challenges, and differences in adoption levels between the global context and Indonesia during the 2020–2025 period. The research population consists of reputable scientific journal articles that discuss the use of AI in financial auditing. This study employs a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method following the PRISMA 2020 protocol. Article selection was conducted using the Scopus (Q1–Q4) and Sinta (1–2) databases based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, resulting in a final sample of 15 articles. Thematic analysis was applied to identify key patterns and dominant themes within the selected literature. The findings indicate that global auditing practices increasingly utilize machine learning, natural language processing, and robotic process automation to support risk-based auditing, fraud detection, and continuous auditing. AI implementation has been shown to significantly enhance audit efficiency, accuracy, and overall audit quality. Nevertheless, several challenges persist, including high technology investment costs, ethical and data privacy concerns, limitations in auditor competencies, and infrastructure constraints, particularly in developing countries. Comparative analysis reveals that global audit firms are positioned at the innovators and early adopters’ stage, while Indonesia remains at the early majority stage of AI adoption. This study concludes that successful AI implementation in auditing requires an integrated framework that aligns technological readiness, auditor acceptance, and innovation diffusion to sustainably improve audit quality in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adeoye, O., Oluwaseun, O., & Afolabi, B. (2023). Artificial intelligence applications in financial reporting and auditing. Journal of Accounting Research, 61(2), 345-378. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12456

Adolph, T. (2023). AI-powered audit transformation: Productivity and risk management. Deloitte Insights. https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/technology/ai-audit-transformation.html

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Goto, M. (2023). Anticipatory innovation of professional services: The case of auditing and artificial intelligence. Research Policy, 52(10), 104828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104828

Hasanah, N., & Pratama, A. (2025). Continuous auditing berbasis artificial intelligence. Jurnal Akuntansi Indonesia, 15(1), 45-62

Huda, M. M., & Tjandrakirana, R. (2025). Lonjakan biaya audit di era digital: Apakah AI meningkatkan kualitas atau membebani klien? Integrative Perspectives of Social and Science Journal, 2(1), 1-15. https://ipssj.com/article/view/280

IFAC. (2016). International standards on auditing handbook. International Federation of Accountants.

Insirat, Syahfir, & Usman. (2025). Potensi machine learning dalam audit berbasis risiko. Jurnal Akuntansi & Auditing Indonesia, 29(1), 78-95.

Janwanti, N., & Aguspriyani, N. (2024). Penerapan kecerdasan buatan dalam audit keuangan. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 15(2), 210-225.

Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering (Technical Report EBSE-2007-01). Keele University.

Mawlidy, E. R., Primasatya, R. D., & Lorensa, L. (2024). Kemampuan artificial intelligence terhadap pendeteksian fraud: Studi literatur. Jurnal Studi Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 7(1), 89-104. https://akurasi.unram.ac.id/article/view/488

Methley, A. M., Campbell, S., Chew-Graham, C., McNally, R., & Cheraghi-Sohi, S. (2014). PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: A comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews. BMC Health Services Research, 14, 579. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-579

Noordin, N. A., Hussainey, K., & Hayek, M. (2022). The use of artificial intelligence and audit quality: Evidence from UAE auditors. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(8), 339. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15080339

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., ... Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Puthukulam, G., Ravikumar, A., Sharma, R. V. K., & Meesaala, K. M. (2021). Auditors' perception on the impact of artificial intelligence on professional skepticism and judgment. Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance, 9(5), 1184-1190. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujaf.2021.090527

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.

Sabillah, N., et al. (2025). Kesiapan auditor terhadap transformasi digital. Jurnal Akuntansi Indonesia, 14(2), 123-140.

Samiolo, R., Spence, C., & Toh, D. (2024). Auditor judgment in the fourth industrial revolution. Contemporary Accounting Research, 41(1), 498-528. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12901

Sari, H. G. I., & Wahyuda, D. A. (2025). Persepsi auditor Indonesia terhadap artificial intelligence. Owner: Riset & Jurnal Akuntansi, 9(2), 45-62.

Shapovalova, A., Kuzmenko, O., Polishchuk, O., Larikova, T., & Myronchuk, Z. (2023). Modernization of the national accounting and auditing system using digital transformation tools. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, 4(51), 33-52. https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.4.51.2023.4102

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.039

University of Oxford. (2015). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Oxford Martin School. https://www.oxfordmartinschool.ox.ac.uk/downloads/academic/The_Future_of_Employment.pdf

World Economic Forum. (2023). Future of jobs report 2023. https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-jobs-report-2023/

Wulandari, R. (2024). Transformasi digital di Kantor Audit Nasional Thailand. Jurnal Akuntansi Publik Asia, 8(1), 56-72.

Zhang, I. X., et al. (2020). Natural language processing in financial statement analysis. The Accounting Review, 95(4), 123-145. https://doi.org/10.2308/TAR-52654

Downloads

Published

2026-04-13

How to Cite

Andriyanto, R. ., & Januarti, I. . (2026). Implementing Artificial Intelligence in Auditing: A Systematic Literature Review of Trends, Challenges, and Adoption . Owner : Riset Dan Jurnal Akuntansi, 10(2), 1925-1937. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v10i2.3389